Current:Home > reviewsColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -Wealth Nexus Pro
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-14 03:28:23
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (257)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- New Hampshire Republicans are using a land tax law to target northern border crossings
- Massachusetts bill aims to make child care more accessible and affordable
- Watch as onboard parachute saves small plane from crashing into Washington suburb
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- 'The shooter didn't snap': Prosecutors say Michigan dad could have prevented mass killing
- Investigators say tenant garage below collapsed Florida condo tower had many faulty support columns
- Virginia budget leaders confirm Alexandria arena deal is out of the proposed spending plan
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- US fencers raise concerns about biased judging, impact on Paris Olympic team
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Kentucky high school evacuated after 'fart spray' found in trash cans, officials say
- Putin’s crackdown casts a wide net, ensnaring the LGBTQ+ community, lawyers and many others
- U.S. charges Chinese national with stealing AI trade secrets from Google
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Lone orca kills great white shark in never-before-seen incident, scientists say
- Lace Up, These Hoka Sneaker Deals Won’t Last Long & You Can Save Up to 51%
- Starbucks launches spring menu, including 2 new iced lavender drinks
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Indiana nears law allowing more armed statewide officials at state Capitol
Panel says the next generation of online gambling will be more social, engaged and targeted
Katy Perry's Backside-Baring Red Carpet Look Will Leave You Wide Awake
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
New York library won't let man with autism use children's room. His family called the restriction 'callous'
The Excerpt podcast: Alabama lawmakers pass IVF protections for patients and providers
NYC public servants accused of stealing identities of homeless in pandemic fraud scheme