Current:Home > MyAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Wealth Nexus Pro
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:40:38
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (392)
Related
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Michigan woman to stand trial in crash that killed young brother and sister at birthday party
- Three biggest surprise picks from first round of 2024 NBA draft
- NHRA icon John Force upgraded, but still in ICU four days after scary crash
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- GAP’s 4th of July Sale Includes an Extra 50% off Versatile Staples & Will Make You Say U-S-YAY
- Biden administration extends temporary legal status to 300,000 Haitians, drawing a contrast to Trump
- California bill crafted to require school payments to college athletes pulled by sponsor
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- A father who lost 2 sons in a Boeing Max crash waits to hear if the US will prosecute the company
Ranking
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Kourtney Kardashians Details Her Attachment Parenting Approach for Baby Rocky
- Shop Old Navy’s Red, White and Whoa! 4th of July Sale With Deals Starting at $2 & More Great Finds
- South Korea says apparent North Korean hypersonic missile test ends in mid-air explosion
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- FACT FOCUS: Here’s a look at some of the false claims made during Biden and Trump’s first debate
- Flouting Biden Pause, Agency OK’s Largest LNG Terminal in US
- Man, woman in their 80s are killed in double homicide in western Michigan, police say
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Baseus power banks recalled after dozens of fires, 13 burn injuries
How many points did Caitlin Clark score last night? Rookie frustrated as Fever fall to Storm
The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
Even as inflation cools, Americans report sticker shock at grocery store register
Biden campaign, DNC highlight democracy, Jan. 6 in lead-up to debate
The Supreme Court weakens federal regulators, overturning decades-old Chevron decision